Jamie Carragher has drawn comparisons between Alexander Isak’s potential transfer to Liverpool and Fernando Torres’ move to Chelsea, suggesting Liverpool’s desperation for a center-forward could give them an edge in signing the Newcastle star. Here’s what’s happening ¹ ²:

– Liverpool’s Desperation: Carragher believes Liverpool’s urgent need for a center-forward could drive their pursuit of Isak. He stated that Liverpool are “desperate” for a striker, which might give them an advantage in negotiations.

– Isak’s Potential Move: Isak has been linked to several top clubs, including Arsenal and Liverpool. However, Carragher thinks Liverpool are better-positioned to sign him due to their recent success and the potential appeal of playing for a title-winning team.

– Contract Situation: Newcastle United have a strong negotiating position regarding Isak, with his contract running until 2028. The club might require a significant offer, potentially over £100 million, to consider selling him.

– Carragher’s Take: Carragher questioned the realism of Arsenal signing Isak, given his contract situation and the club’s financial constraints. He thinks Liverpool’s recent league win could make them a more attractive option for Isak.

Key Points to Consider

– Isak’s Performance: Alexander Isak has been in excellent form, scoring 27 goals in 42 matches for Newcastle last season. His impressive performance has caught the attention of several top clubs.

– Newcastle’s Stance: Newcastle United seem determined to keep Isak, with Eddie Howe expressing his desire to see the player back in a Newcastle shirt.

– Transfer Speculation: The potential transfer fee for Isak could be substantial, with some estimates suggesting over £150 million.

Comparison to Fernando Torres

While there’s no direct comparison made by Carragher to Fernando Torres’ transfer to Chelsea in the provided search results, Torres’ move from Liverpool to Chelsea in 2011 for £50 million was a significant transfer deal. If Carragher draws parallels between the two situations, it might be due to the high-profile nature of both transfers and the potential impact on the respective clubs ².