Alexander Isak’s potential transfer to Liverpool from Newcastle United has sparked debate about whether he can use FIFA’s Article 17 to terminate his contract unilaterally.
Alexander Isak’s potential transfer to Liverpool from Newcastle United has sparked debate about whether he can use FIFA’s Article 17 to terminate his contract unilaterally. According to sports lawyer experts, Isak might be able to leverage this rule, but the process is complex and uncertain.
Understanding FIFA’s Article 17
Article 17 allows players to terminate their contracts unilaterally under specific circumstances. However, this rule typically applies to players with less than three years remaining on their contract or those aged 28 and above with less than two years left.
Isak’s Contract Situation
Isak has three years remaining on his contract with Newcastle United. To terminate his contract under Article 17, he’d need to demonstrate “just cause” or negotiate a mutual termination with the club.
Potential Compensation
If Isak terminates his contract under Article 17, the compensation fee would be determined by FIFA. Experts estimate the fee could range from £50-£60 million, significantly lower than Newcastle’s valuation of around £150 million.
Challenges and Uncertainties
Invoking Article 17 can lead to lengthy legal battles and uncertainty. A final judgment could take 18 months to two years, but Isak would be free to play for Liverpool or another club during this period.
Isak’s Options
Isak’s options include ¹ ²:
– Negotiating a Transfer: Isak can try to negotiate a transfer to Liverpool or another club, potentially with a player-plus-cash arrangement.
– Mutual Termination: Newcastle and Isak could mutually agree to terminate his contract, allowing him to join another club without a lengthy legal battle.
– Sporting Just Cause: If Newcastle excludes Isak from playing for an extended period without justification, he might be able to claim “sporting just cause” and terminate his contract.
Implications for Newcastle and Liverpool
If Isak invokes Article 17, Newcastle might face significant financial losses. Liverpool, on the other hand, would need to consider the potential risks and costs associated with signing a player with an uncertain contractual situation.
Conclusion
While Isak might be able to use FIFA’s Article 17 to terminate his contract, the outcome is far from certain. The situation will likely depend on negotiations between Isak, Newcastle, and potential suitors like Liverpool. A transfer fee of around £150 million might be required to secure Isak’s services, but the exact amount will depend on various factors, including the clubs’ willingness to negotiate ³ ⁴.