With Aidan Hutchinson out due to a broken leg, the Detroit Lions explored multiple trade possibilities for edge rushers, ranging from improbable targets to realistic options. While Myles Garrett of the Cleveland Browns was an unlikely candidate, the Lions ultimately secured Za’Darius Smith instead.

Despite the low chances of acquiring Garrett, rumors persisted that Detroit had inquired about him—just as they reportedly did with Maxx Crosby from the Raiders. On Monday, following recent remarks from Browns GM Andrew Berry, Garrett publicly admitted that he had requested a trade, something The Athletic’s Dianna Russini reported had been known internally for a while.

Although Garrett’s trade request became the biggest NFL story of the day, the Browns swiftly made it clear through multiple sources that they had no intention of trading him. ESPN’s Jeremy Fowler noted that Garrett’s desire to leave wasn’t financially motivated but driven by his ambition to win.

Radio Host Mike Valenti Stresses the Lions’ Position on Garrett

Back in October, Mike Valenti of 97.1 The Ticket strongly urged the Lions to pursue Garrett. However, major obstacles—including the high trade cost and the necessity of a record-breaking contract—made such a move challenging. Additionally, Lions GM Brad Holmes’ focus on a draft-and-develop approach made a blockbuster deal unlikely.

Following recent developments, Valenti doubled down on his stance during his Monday show, arguing that if the Lions don’t make a move for Garrett, another Super Bowl-contending team will. He cited the Bills, 49ers, Ravens, and Packers as possible landing spots.

While Valenti suggested that few assets should be considered untouchable—including scenarios involving three first-round picks plus Brian Branch—his main argument remained clear: the Lions must at least engage in trade discussions. Avoiding negotiations due to the high price tag isn’t an option for a team with championship aspirations.